Dystopian Societies-1984 vs Fahrenheit 451

Dystopian Visions An grotesque comp all consisting of oppressive squalor in which on the whole atomic number 18 heavily restricted by the positive superiority of the ruling party. A beau monde where repression and restrictions face boundless, date the individual liberty of the citizen seems boundlessly obstructed. A society where psychical deprivation and deception is the oddment of the guardian a society where misery and distress are thrust upon the unsuspectingly loyal citizens a society where the well- cosmos of the people are of incognizable acknowledgement, yet its inhabitants have been manipulated into perceiving such as utopian. remote to their deceit induced perceptions, these characteristics are quite the other of utopian, they are dystopian Many authors portray their stimulate vision of a dystopia with novels. Two super intriguing dystopian novels are George Orwells, 1984, and Ray Bradburys, Fahrenheit(postnominal)(postnominal)(postnominal) 451. Their visi ons were strikingly similar as the themes were both(prenominal) ground on totalitarian governances maintaining restrain through propaganda and affable/social deprivation (mostly corporate and bureaucratic controls, although proficient control was utilized).The protagonists find themselves in almost homogeneous situations, for they have become beginner of the misery, sacrifice, and evil that their society possesses. But they must(prenominal) conceal their knowledge, going them trapped, although they could not keep it hidden forever. In both novels came the amiable sheltering of the society to thwart contradicting or rebellious idea that would come with the enlightenment of the sacrifices the society was withstanding. This social and mental control would r nullifyer the majority of society incapable of independent eyeshot, allowing the injustices to proceed.Forced ignorance masked the evil the government had laid upon them and if one were to unveil the ignorance, they had to conceal it with their lives. In both novels, those who could not shield their enlightenment would conciliate victim to the strong and cunning police forces of the society. These forces would savagely murder and vanquish the existence of those free of the governments mental sanitation. As shown by the thought police in 1984. This shows the extent to which the extinction of entropy and individuality was pursued.Another shared characteristic, although much more obvious in 1984, is the use of propaganda in manipulating the people. In Fahrenheit 451, the propaganda came in the form of death. They would publically murder those who disobeyed, just as you see in the end of movie when they murder Montag. In 1984, the society was infested with speculative Brother propaganda. With posters, Two Minutes Hate, rarefied numbers, and constant reassurance of Big Brother being the unflawed and great protector of everyone, they deceived the people. I would like to office out the fact t hat they didnt share the alike(p) figurehead type worship.In 1984, everything and everyone was focused and go around around Big Brother, whereas in Fahrenheit 451, there wasnt as much as the singular idol to worship and direct appraise towards. These societies painted by Bradbury and Orwell both utilized mental and social hindrance, through strong regulations. This type of control is otherwise known as the bureaucratic control. In Fahrenheit 451 they put heavy restrictions on literature, and would fire all books they could locate. In 1984, they were absolutely relentless with their regulations, up to now the wrong facial expression could get you killed. unified control was also highly utilized in these societies. Specifically, they would brainwash you as a daily spell called Two Minutes Hate in the, 1984, novel. hither is an example of the Two Minute Hates effect on the people, a desire to kill, to torture, to clank faces in with a sledge hammer, seemed to flow through the wh ole group of people like an galvanizing current (Orwell14). The government happyly manipulated the inhabitants into loving and emotion completely dependent to Big Brother and the government, while completely despising whoever Big Brother envisioned as the enemy. Big Brother altered everything to mark him seem absolutely flawless and created a traitorously sense of superior and improving living conditions. exclusively of this advertising and false media was not unique to, 1984, though. In Fahrenheit 451, the government would use the media to show the deaths of those who stone-broke regulations in place. Technological control was a ternion control used, as Telescreen monitors were implanted everywhere in 1984, to ensure complete surveillance to avoid any risk of conspiracies or deviation from their norms.In Fahrenheit 451, they had robotic dogs that could sniff out and locate any human needed. The protagonists in these novels, Montag and Winston, are both unique to their soc iety for they had the power to unveil the mask of ignorance and be enlightened to the true colors of the society they lived in. They both matte trapped and desperately needed to escape or alter their society. The departures between them and the others are made plain more apparent by their wives and how they end up olfactory perception about them. Winston mentally nicknamed his wife, the human tidy track, (Orwell66) during their relationship.This being very similar to Montags feeling towards his bland and uninteresting wife as well. They both are overwhelmed by the now painfully visible misery and evil their society consists of, but must protect such thoughts with their lives. A significant difference between the two characters is the fact that Guy Montag was successful with his attempt to better society, for his city was destroyed leaving it up to him and some others to rebuild society. This unlike Winston, who was captured, tortured, and then allowed back into society with a new conformist attitude.These novels are criticizing the paths and patterns that human governments tend to take. With governments concealing/ security review information from the people and corruption being so widespread and apparent these authors are presenting a assertable outcome of our chronic blunder. Orwell was even directly criticizing the reign over of Stalin in his day and how horrible such a society is and can be. These societies reflect the negatives of our society in a bloated and extreme way and if these relevant evils are not eliminated, our society is at risk of being reduced to a dreaded dystopia.